PD-1 is an immune checkpoint receptor. Binding of PD-1 by its ligands leads to downregulation of T-cell function. PD-L2, one of two known binding partners for PD-1 (the other one is PD-L1), negatively regulates T cells in immune responses, and plays an important role in immune tolerance.  This mechanism is usurped by many tumors.
PD-L2 protein expression in human tumors was associated with clinical response to pembrolizumab (Keytruda?; Merck & Co | MSD), an anti-PD-1 immunotherapy, independent of PD-L1 expression, in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), according to a study funded by Merck and published in Clinical Cancer Research, a journal published by the American Association fo?r Cancer Research.
Two binding partners
?It is well known that PD-1 has two binding partners, PD-L1 and PD-L2, yet most of the published work to date has looked at the distribution and predictive benefits of PD-L1 expression alone,? noted Jennifer H. Yearley, DVM, PhD, senior principal scientist of Anatomic Pathology at Merck Research Laboratories in Palo Alto, California.
?We developed an assay that detects PD-L2 with a high degree of specificity and sensitivity to evaluate the prevalence of PD-L2 in human tumors and assess the relationship of PD-L2 expression with clinical response to pembrolizumab in patients with HNSCC,? she added.
Multiple cancer types
First, Yearley and colleagues analyzed over 400 archival tumor samples across seven cancer types, including renal cell carcinoma, bladder, melanoma, non-small cell lung cancer, triple negative breast cancer, gastric carcinoma, and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma or HNSCC, with the novel immunohistochemistry assay.
?We were very surprised to find how common PD-L2 expression was across all of the tumor types we evaluated,? Yearley noted.
PD-L2 expression varied significantly
They also discovered that PD-L2 expression varied significantly among tumor types: gastric cancer and triple negative breast cancer showed generally moderate to high levels of expression, whereas expression in renal cell carcinoma was predominantly low. Furthermore, over half of the HNSCC samples showed tumor cell expression of PD-L2, while tumor cell expression was not seen in any of the renal cell carcinoma and very few of the melanoma samples.
|Overall Response Rates by PD-L1 and PD-L2 Status|
|PD-L1 Status||0%||? 1%|
|0%||1/18 = 5.6%||0/3=0%|
|? 1%||4/34 = 1.7%||22/89 = 24.7%|
|Table 1.0: PD-L2 Clinical Relevance in Head & Neck Cancer. Logistic regression suggest PD-L2 expression is associated with higher ORR after adjusting for PD-L1 expression (P= 0.072). PD-L2 is positively associated with longer PFS after adjusting for impact of PD-L1 status (P= 0.031). Overall, the available data suggest that PD-L2 status is associated with outcomes in pembrolizumab treated patients. This overview includes data is from 144 HNSCC patients (KEYNOTE-012) with recurrent or metastatic disease, regardless of PD-L1 or HPV status measurable disease per RECIST 1.1, ECOG PS of 0 or 1 who received pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks. PD-L1 (22C3) and PD-L2 (3G2) scoring available.|
Next, Yearley and colleagues evaluated tumor samples from 172 patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in two combined cohorts who had been assigned treatment with pembrolizumab during the KEYNOTE-012 trial. They found that clinical response was related to expression of PD-L2, suggesting that therapy targeting both PD-L1 and PD-L2 may enhance patient response.
?The overall response rate (ORR) for the two KEYNOTE-012 cohorts in this study was 27.5 percent among patients whose tumors were positive for both PD-L1 and PD-L2, more than two times higher than the 11.4 percent ORR for patients whose tumors were positive only for PD-L1,? Yearley observed.
The researchers also found that PD-L2 positivity was associated with longer overall survival (OS), and median OS times were 303 days and 109 days respectively.
?We are all aware that PD-L1 is a marker with varying degrees of predictive ability in different tumor types,? said Yearley. ?There are individuals who are PD-L1 positive who don?t respond, and people who are PD-L1 negative who do respond.?
“Overall, this study suggests that PD-L2 expression may provide additional information beyond PD-L1 positivity in predicting clinical response to anti-PD-1 therapies,” Yearley explained.
As regards further ongoing work, expression of PD-L2 along with PD-L1 and other immune related analytes is included in a gene expression profile that reflects a T-cell inflamed tumor microenvironment, Yearley said.
This profile has been shown to be related to response to anti-PD-1 therapy and is currently being evaluated for potential diagnostic use in pembrolizumab clinical trials, she further noted.
Limitations of the study include that the data obtained using the new assay was not compared with other standard detection and scoring methods, and a cutoff for PD-L2 expression levels associated with positive clinical response was not established, as this was an exploratory study.
Last editorial review: June 16, 2017
Featured Image: Microscope Courtesy: ? 2017 Fotolia. Used with permission. Photo 1.0: Peter Sicinski, MD, PhD, Professor of Genetics, Harvard Medical School. Courtesy: ? 2017. Used with permission.
Copyright ? 2017 Sunvalley Communication, LLC. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Sunvalley Communication content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Sunvalley Communication. Sunvalley Communication shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Onco?Zine, Oncozine and The Onco?Zine Brief are registered trademarks and trademarks of Sunvalley Communication around the world.