microscope lens with a beam of green light

A study by a research team based at the University of Chicago and funded in part by the European Research Commission, found that by connecting highly effective cancer immunotherapy drugs such as the anti-CTLA4 agent ipilimumab (Yervoy?; Bristol-Myers Squibb Company) and the anti-PD-L1 drug atezolizumab (Tecentriq?; Genentech/Roche) to peptides that bind to tissues in and around tumors, it is possible to improve the impact of the drugs while limiting treatment-related side effects.

Revolutionizing treatment
In the last five years, these drugs, known as checkpoint inhibitors, have revolutionized treatment for a wide range of cancers. They can overcome barriers that prevent a patient’s immune system from finding and removing tumor cells. But these drugs, administered through an intravenous drip directly into the blood stream, often trigger troubling autoimmune responses.

Two out of three patients receiving this form of immunotherapy have grade-3 or 4 adverse effects. One third of those patients discontinue therapy because of treatment-related problems.

“We wanted to find a more targeted way to give these drugs,” explained study author Jeffrey Hubbell, PhD, the Eugene Bell Professor in Tissue Engineering at the University of Chicago. “We felt we could reduce the systemic side effects if we could inject them directly into or around a tumor and, more important, keep them there, concentrating the drug in the place where it ought to go.”

In the November 8, 2017 issue of Science Translational Medicine, Hubbell and colleagues show that injecting the drugs directly into tumor sites reduced systemic side effects and enhanced efficacy.

“We weren’t really expecting that both would occur,” Hubbell said. “We were surprised to see such dramatic gains in efficacy.”

The key to improving the performance of these drugs was developing peptides that could anchor the anti-cancer drugs within or adjacent to the tumor environment.

“We had previously discovered a particular peptide sequence that binds to the many components of extra-cellular matrix,” Hubbell said.

This led to aggressive screening of related compounds, which led them to a “super-affinity” peptide derived from placenta growth factor-2 (PlGF-2), which has an exceptionally high affinity for extra-cellular matrix proteins.

They were then able to identify the precise part of PlGF-2 (the region 123-144) that does the binding. It links to eight common extra-cellular matrix proteins. So the researchers conjugated the PlGF-2123-144 peptide to the anti-cancer drugs anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD-L1.

Testing in mice showed that both conjugates – PlGF-2123-144 anti-CTLA4 and PlGF-2123-144 anti-PD-L1 – were tethered to the injection site. Very little drug entered the blood stream, where it was barely detectable within three days.

Test results indicate that binding the drugs to the tumor matrix could prevent systemic side effects. Eight out of eight 16-week old non-obese diabetic mice developed autoimmune diabetes after treatment with the standard checkpoint blockade drugs, but none of the mice exposed to the conjugated PlGF-2 checkpoint-blockade drugs developed diabetes.

Further tests on mice showed that the modified drug-antibody model slowed growth of implanted tumors and extended survival. Increasing the dose further slowed tumor growth, boosted the number of cancer-killing T cells entering the tumor environment, and enhanced antitumor activity in nearby tumors.

The modified drugs suppressed tumor growth and prolonged survival in mice with transplanted melanoma and breast cancers. It eradicated breast tumors in 11 out of 16 mice, compared to only five out of 15 mice that responded to treatment with standard anti-CTLA4 and anti-PD-L1.

Only one out of nine mice treated with PlGF-2123-144 anti-CTLA4 and PlGF-2123-144 anti-PD-L1 developed a palpable tumor after being re-challenged with breast tumor cells, an indication that these mice had developed immunologic memory.

“We think we have developed a straightforward way to modify the really important immunotherapy drugs that work remarkably well in some patients but don’t work at all in others,” Hubbell said.

“We found that we can enhance efficacy, at least in this mouse model. Perhaps more important, we believe we can reduce the side effects of these remarkable but problematic drugs, allowing patients who need them to remain on the therapy,” he concluded.


Last Editorial Review: November 16, 2017

Featured Image: Microscope. Courtesy: ? Fotolia | Used with permission.

Copyright ? 2017 Sunvalley Communication, LLC. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Sunvalley Communication content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Sunvalley Communication. Sunvalley Communication shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Onco?Zine, Oncozine and The Onco?Zine Brief are registered trademarks and trademarks of Sunvalley Communication around the world.

Advertisement