Breast Cancer, Breast Cancer Awareness Ribbon, Pink.

Sorting out when or whether to get mammograms can be perplexing for any woman, and a health provider?s advice may not settle the matter. That?s because even experts disagree about when screening mammography is appropriate and for whom.

That?s what Women Informed to Screen Depending on Measures of Risk (WISDOM) seeks to remedy.

Photo 1.0: Laura Esserman, MD, professor of surgery and director of the Carol Franc Buck Breast Care Center at the UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center. Watch the video: Athena Wisdom Studio

The UC Health, system-wide study aims to uncover whether annual mammograms really are the best way to screen for breast cancer, or whether a more personalized approach ? driven by the data attached to each woman?s genetic makeup, family history and risk factors ? could deliver better results.

?We need better answers for screening,? explained Laura Esserman, MD,? professor of surgery and director of the Carol Franc Buck Breast Care Center at the UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, who is leading the study.

?There is so much controversy around screening, and women get caught in the middle. The only way we can do better is if people participate in a program like this,? Esserman added.

Advertisement #3

Recruitment
The Wisdom study is now recruiting 100,000 women from throughout California.

Participants do not need to receive their care from a UC Health facility. To join, a woman fills out an extensive online questionnaire that covers health and family history, and each is invited to be randomized (assigned by chance) to either the personalized or the annual screening arm of the study.

Women in the annual screening arm will have annual mammograms, and those in the personalized arm will be assessed for their risk of developing breast cancer, and given a genetic test.

?We?ve learned so much about how an individual?s genes impact their cancer risk, and I think we can use that information to improve health outcomes today,? noted Sandy Borowsky, professor in the Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and principal investigator on the study at UC Davis.

?Advanced sequencing technology has made this analysis fast, accurate and inexpensive.?

Those with the highest personal risk will receive recommendations to begin screening at an earlier age, have mammograms more often and continue screening until they are older. Those with the lowest risk will begin screening later, screen less frequently and stop screening earlier. The study anticipates the majority of women will fall into the lowest risk category, though no woman will be screened less often than the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force guidelines recommend.

Several insurance companies have opted to cover the cost of the genetic tests; for participants who do not have coverage, the tests will be paid for with philanthropic funds.

Minimizing false positives
Esserman noted that the study is designed to minimize the incidence of ‘false positive’ mammogram results, as well as of cancers detected between mammogram screenings or at later stages. Women with known high-risk genetic mutations will be screened according to National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines.[1]

On average as many as 1 out of 10 women who will have a routine mammogram will receive a ‘false positive’ result. The majority of these women does not have cancer, but, after a mammogram, receive a call-back for additional testing, which ultimately turns out not to be breast cancer. In some cases, this is simply a request to come in for more mammograms because the initial pictures weren?t clear enough. However, in some cases the ‘false positive’ mammogram may result in a diagnosis for breast cancer, which leads to anxiety and worry about the ‘diagnosis’, as well as additional tests and, sometimes, unnecessary surgery.

Personalized Screening
In addition to finding out if personalized screening is as safe as annual screening, the study will work to determine if it causes fewer harms such as unnecessary follow-up screenings, biopsies or other procedures, and whether women accept the approach.

According to Esserman, personalized screening may also prove to help prevent aggressive cancers by detecting genetic risk earlier and using proven drugs known to lower the risk.

?Also, personalized screening promotes healthcare value,? she noted.

?It?s time to say we need to find a way to improve quality and in a way that costs less. That?s in everyone?s best interest. More is not better. More is just more.?

The Wisdom Study

is the result of a 5-year, US$ 14.1 million grant from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). It is the first study conducted through Athena Breast Health Network, a collaboration of the five University of California medical centers to drive innovation in breast cancer prevention, screening and treatment.

For more information watch the video: Athena Wisdom Studio


Featured Image: Breast Cancer, Breast Cancer Awareness Ribbon, Pink. Courtesy: ? 2017. Fotolia. Used with permission. Photo 1.0: Laura Esserman, MD. Courtesy: ? 2017. Carol Franc Buck Breast Care Center at the UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center. Used with permission.

Copyright ? 2017 Sunvalley Communication, LLC. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution of Sunvalley Communication content, including by framing or similar means, is expressly prohibited without the prior written consent of Sunvalley Communication. Sunvalley Communication shall not be liable for any errors or delays in the content, or for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Onco?Zine, Oncozine and The Onco?Zine Brief are registered trademarks and trademarks of Sunvalley Communication around the world.

Advertisement #5